IS
Intelliscan Standards Institute Universities, Colleges & Polytechnics  Β·  Similarity Detection & Plagiarism Check (UCPSDPC)
πŸ” Sign in / Live account β†’ Plagiarism Compliance Director Β· ISI-PCD-014
Sources checked: 1.28M national Β· 92M global papers Β· open web Β· 1.9M books β€’ Checks run today: 3,941 β€’ Engine: UCPSDPC v2.4 Β· No foreign tool in the loop β€’ Status: Live since Jan 2026
1 Submission intake
β€Ί
2 Engine analysis
β€Ί
3 Banded report
β€Ί
4 Decision & certificate
Intelliscan Standards Institute Β· Anthropic & OpenAI partner

Tackling Plagiarism at a National Scale

The credibility of any academic qualification is fundamentally dependent on the integrity and originality of the work upon which it is awarded. Rigorous plagiarism detection and originality verification are essential to safeguarding academic standards, preserving the reputation of educational institutions, and maintaining the confidence of employers, professional bodies, and the international community in Nigerian graduates.

Equally important is the timely and accurate execution of the verification process. Effective plagiarism assessment ensures that students who have adhered to academic integrity standards are not subjected to unnecessary delays, while supervisors, examiners, and institutions can confidently uphold the validity of academic outcomes. A robust and transparent originality verification framework strengthens trust in the educational system and reinforces the value of every qualification awarded.

Ultimately, each Certificate of Originality serves as formal evidence that a graduate’s work has met established standards of academic integrity, providing assurance that the qualification can be recognized and relied upon both nationally and internationally.

🎯 What the platform delivers
1
Independent, in-country verificationAn independent standards authority detects plagiarism against its own corpus β€” no reliance on foreign tools or foreign-currency licences.
2
The full student-to-certificate workflowStudent submits & pays β†’ banded report β†’ approve & certify (university notified) if it passes, or return for revision if it doesn't.
3
Detection beyond similarityVerbatim, paraphrase, AI-generated text, cross-language reuse, and contract cheating β€” caught and explained, not just a single number.
4
Defensible & accountableBanded scoring, tamper-evident audit trail, resubmission integrity, and oversight analytics β€” every verdict auditable.
πŸ›οΈ Why an independent standards authority
βš–οΈ
Independent authorityVerdicts come from a neutral standards body β€” not the same institution that supervised the work.Arm's length
πŸŽ“
Recognised certificateAn Intelliscan Certificate of Originality the student can attach, and the university can verify.Verifiable
πŸ›‘οΈ
Standards-backedOne published originality standard, applied consistently to every submission.Consistent
πŸ‡³πŸ‡¬
Sovereign & affordableHosted in Nigeria on a local corpus β€” no foreign-currency per-check licences.Local corpus

Students come directly to the Institute, pay per submission, and receive an independent, defensible originality verdict.

πŸ“ˆ The challenge in numbers
200+
Tertiary institutions, nationwide
public & private
Millions
Theses, projects, SIWES & articles
checked every year
Every one
Submission verified before certifying
standardised
Days→Mins
Review time, manual vs engine
automated
πŸ“Š Pilot results so far (Jan–Jun 2026)
48,217
Submissions checked
across pilot institutions
21.6%
Overall flag rate
β–Ό from 31% in Jan
1,142
Exact duplicates caught
incl. cross-institution
78%
Passed clean on first check
GREEN band

Pilot figures are illustrative demo data; the live system computes them from real UCPSDPC checks. Full breakdowns on the National analytics tab.

🧭 Our goals β€” five principles that change the game
πŸ‡³πŸ‡¬
SovereignHosted & controlled in Nigeria, on a local corpus
⚑
AutomatedInstant, consistent β€” no manual bottlenecks
πŸ”—
DirectStudents submit straight to the Institute
πŸ›‘οΈ
Standards-backedEvery verdict defensible, auditable, certified
πŸ’°
AffordableLocally priced for sustainable national coverage
πŸ—‚οΈ Explore the platform
1
Single submissionOne project checked: banded report, exclude filters, side-by-side sources, AI & authorship checks.
2
Batch verificationFour real student projects cross-checked β€” catching an exact duplicate and a shared chapter live.
3
Resubmission & auditRe-verifying a failed project β€” proving the work was genuinely revised, with a tamper-evident ledger.
4
National analyticsFederal oversight: flag rates by institution, department & zone, and the improving trend.
5
ReportsPrintable official reports for a student, an institution, the nation, a batch or a case.
6
Ask IntelliscanA Claude-powered copilot answering natural-language questions over student, school & national data.
Intelliscan Standards Institute Β· Originality VerificationStudents submit their work directly to the Institute for plagiarism verification & certification
Verification DeskIntelliscan Standards Institute Β· ● online

Step 1 β€” Vendor uploads the student's project

The student submits their work directly to the Intelliscan Standards Institute for verification. Enter the candidate's details and the work, then run the originality engine.

⬆️
Drag & drop the project file here
or click to browse  Β·  PDF, .docx and .txt are extracted automatically
National threshold 20% set by regulator Β· refs excluded
0 words

Step 2 β€” Sovereign engine analysis (UCPSDPC pipeline)

Each submission flows through complementary layers; signals fuse into one explainable originality report.

Step 3 β€” Banded originality report

GREEN
0%
overall similarity index
Verbatim copy
0%
exact-text matches in corpus
Paraphrase / semantic
0%
reworded passages (embeddings)
AI-generated likelihood
0%
reported separately Β· not copying
Citation integrity
OK
references cross-checked
🎚️ Exclusions toggling recomputes the similarity index live
πŸ“„ Flagged passages
Verbatim Paraphrase AI-likely Excluded Β· click a highlight to see the source
πŸ—‚οΈ Top matched sources across all source universes

Matches are attributed to where they were found β€” the national corpus (material foreign tools never indexed), institutional back-catalogues, global journals, the open web and published books. New deposits expand the national corpus with every check.

Step 4 β€” Decision & certificate

Intelliscan intake batch β€” cross-check verification

Four real student projects were received for deposit. The engine checks every submission against every other (and, in production, against the full national corpus). All matching below is computed live in your browser from the actual document text.

πŸ”’ Verbatim overlap matrix shared exact phrasing between each pair
≀ threshold borderline above tolerance

Per-submission verdicts

Click any submission to see the evidence.

Resubmission & audit β€” re-verifying a failed project

A project that failed is never a fresh upload. It stays one case with a version history, so when the student resubmits, the Institute can confirm the work was genuinely revised β€” not gutted to beat the threshold β€” and every step is recorded in a tamper-evident ledger.

Demo β€” what did the student resubmit?

Audit trail β€” tamper-evident ledger

Every event is hash-chained: each ledger entry carries a fingerprint of the one before it, so nothing can be altered or back-dated. Document fingerprints prove exactly what was checked at each version.

Reports β€” generate & print

Produce a formatted report for a student, an institution, the nation, today's batch, or a case file β€” then Print / Save as PDF to hand it over.

πŸ€–
Ask Intelliscan β€” integrity copilotNatural-language queries over student status, schools, projects & national data
Model
πŸ“Œ Demo copilot β€” answers are generated offline from this demo's data. In production this is a Claude-powered assistant querying the live Intelliscan database, with every answer access-logged.

National originality dashboard β€” Institute oversight view

Because the Intelliscan Standards Institute verifies submissions from across the country, it sees the whole picture: which institutions, departments and regions carry the most plagiarism risk, and whether the culture is improving over time.

πŸ“Œ Figures on this dashboard are illustrative demo data for the pitch β€” in production they are computed from live UCPSDPC checks across all accredited institutions.
National flag-rate trend β€” Jan to Jun 2026Share of submissions banded AMBER or RED each month, against rising check volume
Flag rate by institutionUniversities & colleges with the highest share of flagged submissions
Flag rate by disciplineDepartments ranked by flagged-submission share, nationwide
Verdict band distributionHow all checked submissions resolved
Flag rate by geopolitical zoneRegional spread of originality risk
Institution scorecardPick an institution to benchmark it against the national average
Repeat-similarity watchlistCandidates with multiple flagged attempts β€” early-warning for contract cheating
Cross-institution duplicate alertsThe same work detected at more than one institution
Intelliscan Standards Institute Β· Originality verification for universities, colleges & polytechnics Β· Β© 2026